AiRecMark/Intelligence/Usability leaders
C-02 · Usability leadersarchive-recorded · snapshot 2026-09-17

Usability Leaders: Top 25

The 25 highest usability scores (score.dims.usability) across all 448 archives, each shown against its overall score so the deviation is visible. Aggregation is a plain sort of recorded values — no re-weighting; method and N are published below.

Key numbers

Archives ranked
448
data/tools · N=448
Usability median
82
score.dims.usability · N=448
Top score
96
score.dims.usability · N=448
Leader
Canva
score.dims.usability · N=448
Correlation with overall
r=0.63
pearson(dim, overall) · N=448

Usability — top 25 of 448

sort: dims desc, then overall desc, then slug; deviation = dim − overall

#ToolCategoryUsabilityOverallDeviation
1CanvaDesign9687.1+8.9
2ChatGPTResearch9490.9+3.1
3GrammarlyWriting9483.1+10.9
4Notion AIWriting9386.7+6.3
5ClaudeResearch9288.9+3.1
6PerplexityResearch9288.4+3.6
7FathomWorkflow Automation9286.1+5.9
8DeepL WriteWriting9285.8+6.2
9QuillBotWriting9285.2+6.8
10Wispr FlowAudio & Voice9282.8+9.2
11GammaWriting9281.8+10.2
12GeminiResearch9188.5+2.5
13CursorCoding9089.2+0.8
14GitHub CopilotCoding9088.1+1.9
15DeepWikiResearch9085.4+4.6
16OpusClipVideo9083.2+6.8
17HeyGenVideo9082.9+7.1
18PhindResearch9082.8+7.2
19Base44App Builders9082.4+7.6
20PhotoRoomDesign9081.9+8.1
21Otter.aiWriting9081.1+8.9
22SynthesiaVideo9080.8+9.2
23Image CreatorDesign9080.2+9.8
24ElevenLabsAudio & Voice8887.8+0.2
25Semantic ScholarResearch8887.5+0.5

Usability — top 10

Canva96ChatGPT94Grammarly94Notion AI93Claude92Perplexity92Fathom92DeepL Write92QuillBot92Wispr Flow92

Recorded score.dims.usability of the ten leading archives (scale 0–100).

Method

  • Population: all 448 archives in data/tools with a recorded score.dims.usability.
  • Ordering: dimension score descending; ties broken by overall descending, then slug ascending — a deterministic total order.
  • Deviation column = score.dims.usability − score.overall per archive; positive values lead their own overall.
  • Pearson r between the dimension and overall is computed over all 448 pairs (standard formula, rounded to 2 decimals).
  • Scores are quoted as recorded in each archive; nothing is recomputed or re-weighted.
Data appendix. Source: data/tools/*.json · snapshot 2026-09-17 · method: sort(score.dims.usability desc, overall desc, slug) top 25 + deviation + pearson · aggregates published with method and N. T1 benchmarks recorded: 3 / 448.