AiRecMark/Intelligence/Feature Depth leaders
C-05 · Feature Depth leadersarchive-recorded · snapshot 2026-09-17

Feature Depth Leaders: Top 25

The 25 highest feature depth scores (score.dims.features) across all 448 archives, each shown against its overall score so the deviation is visible. Aggregation is a plain sort of recorded values — no re-weighting; method and N are published below.

Key numbers

Archives ranked
448
data/tools · N=448
Feature Depth median
78
score.dims.features · N=448
Top score
94
score.dims.features · N=448
Leader
ChatGPT
score.dims.features · N=448
Correlation with overall
r=0.67
pearson(dim, overall) · N=448

Feature Depth — top 25 of 448

sort: dims desc, then overall desc, then slug; deviation = dim − overall

#ToolCategoryFeature DepthOverallDeviation
1ChatGPTResearch9490.9+3.1
2CursorCoding9289.2+2.8
3GitHub CopilotCoding9088.1+1.9
4ElevenLabsAudio & Voice9087.8+2.2
5PoeResearch9087.1+2.9
6n8nWorkflow Automation9084.8+5.2
7ZapierWorkflow Automation9084.3+5.7
8PlayHTAudio & Voice8989.2-0.2
9ClaudeResearch8888.9-0.9
10GeminiResearch8888.5-0.5
11PerplexityResearch8888.4-0.4
12FLUXDesign8888.3-0.3
13CanvaDesign8887.1+0.9
14Claude CodeCoding8886.1+1.9
15MakeWorkflow Automation8884.7+3.3
16OpenAI CodexCoding8884.6+3.4
17TavusVideo8881.3+6.7
18AlphaSenseResearch8880.3+7.7
19AgentforceWorkflow Automation8877.9+10.1
20AiderCoding8686+0
21DeepgramAudio & Voice8685.1+0.9
22ElicitResearch8684.8+1.2
23AssemblyAIAudio & Voice8684.5+1.5
24Amazon Q DeveloperCoding8684.3+1.7
25FirecrawlResearch8684.2+1.8

Feature Depth — top 10

ChatGPT94Cursor92GitHub Copilot90ElevenLabs90Poe90n8n90Zapier90PlayHT89Claude88Gemini88

Recorded score.dims.features of the ten leading archives (scale 0–100).

Method

  • Population: all 448 archives in data/tools with a recorded score.dims.features.
  • Ordering: dimension score descending; ties broken by overall descending, then slug ascending — a deterministic total order.
  • Deviation column = score.dims.features − score.overall per archive; positive values lead their own overall.
  • Pearson r between the dimension and overall is computed over all 448 pairs (standard formula, rounded to 2 decimals).
  • Scores are quoted as recorded in each archive; nothing is recomputed or re-weighted.
Data appendix. Source: data/tools/*.json · snapshot 2026-09-17 · method: sort(score.dims.features desc, overall desc, slug) top 25 + deviation + pearson · aggregates published with method and N. T1 benchmarks recorded: 3 / 448.