Self-Hosted AI Coding Agents Compared
5 coding tools compared on AiRecMark archive scores, five-dimension quality, published entry pricing and documented target fit.
Cline leads this field with 83.7/100 — +1.1 pts over Tabby.
All figures below are derived from the AiRecMark deterministic five-dimension evaluation archives. Pricing quotes are taken verbatim from each vendor's published plans.
| Rank | Tool & Vendor | Quality / Perf / Usability | Score | Pricing | Best for | Spec |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #1 | CL ClineCline |
86 78 76 |
83.7 | Free open-source (BYOK) · Enterprise custom (S | Open-Source & Cost-Controlled Teams | Inspect |
| #2 | TA TabbyTabbyML |
80 84 84 |
82.6 | Community free self-hosted (≤5 users) · Team $ | Self-Hosting & Privacy Teams | Inspect |
| #3 | CO ContinueContinue (Cursor) |
82 80 84 |
82.3 | Free open source · standalone paid plans no lo | OSS-Minded IDE Users | Inspect |
| #4 | OP OpenHandsAll Hands AI |
82 78 76 |
81.5 | Free open source (self-host) · cloud services | Open-Source Agent Developers | Inspect |
| #5 | RE Refact.aiRefact |
82 80 82 |
81.2 | Free · Pro from $10/mo (40 agent requests/day) | Self-Hosting & Fine-Tuning Teams | Inspect |
Five-Dimension Matrix
| Dimension | Cline | Tabby | Continue | OpenHands | Refact.ai |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Quality | 86 | 80 | 82 | 82 | 82 |
| Features | 84 | 76 | 78 | 82 | 78 |
| Usability | 76 | 84 | 84 | 76 | 82 |
| Performance | 78 | 84 | 80 | 78 | 80 |
| Value | 92 | 90 | 88 | 88 | 84 |
Choose By Fit
Cline
Cline · 83.7/100Choose Cline if you need open-source & cost-controlled teams.
- No token markup — bring your own model keys
- Apache-2.0 transparency with self-host path
Tabby
TabbyML · 82.6/100Choose Tabby if you need self-hosting & privacy teams.
- Free self-hosted community edition
- Your code never leaves your infra
Continue
Continue (Cursor) · 82.3/100Choose Continue if you need oss-minded ide users.
- Open-source core remains freely available
- Hub of MCP rules and blocks
OpenHands
All Hands AI · 81.5/100Choose OpenHands if you need open-source agent developers.
- Purpose-built for open-source agent developers
- Multi-file agentic edits out of the box
Refact.ai
Refact · 81.2/100Choose Refact.ai if you need self-hosting & fine-tuning teams.
- Open-source agent with Docker self-hosting
- Unlimited free completions (Qwen2.5-Coder)
Deterministic Takeaway
Cline tops the composite index at 83.7/100. Dimension leaders across the field — Quality: Cline, Features: Cline, Usability: Tabby, Performance: Tabby, Value: Cline. Every ranking and dimension value on this page is drawn from the archive-recorded AiRecMark tool archives as of 2026-09-17 and can be traced back to the public tool profiles.
Related Head-to-Head Comparisons
Aider vs Trae vs Kilo vs Cline vs Continue vs CodeGeeX
Free AI Coding Agents Compared: Where the Free Tiers Hold Up
Cursor vs Cline
Cursor vs Cline: head-to-head comparison
Claude Code vs Aider vs OpenAI Codex vs OpenHands vs Roomote
Terminal Coding Agents Compared: CLI-First Workflows
Claude Code vs GitHub Copilot
Agent vs autocomplete: what AI code review and PR tools actually change