AiRecMark/AI Tools/Coding Agents/Magic (Magic.dev)

Magic

verified v2026.9 Coverage Tier

Frontier long-context models for software engineering automation

VENDOR: Magic.dev LICENSE: Proprietary / SaaS SECURITY: Standard cloud security LAST BENCHMARK: Verified 2026-09-15
Launch Magic arrow_forward
Empirical Performance Audit

Macro Intelligence Index

71.6 /100 Coverage Tier
Relative Velocity
#54 of 55
Archive record
4 recorded features
Source: magic.dev
Output quality
score.dims.quality
source: archive
Output Quality & Reliability (Weighted 25%) 78.0%
correctness and consistency of primary task output. AiRecMark rubric v2
Feature Depth & Integrations (Weighted 20%) 74.0%
breadth of integrations, APIs, and advanced capabilities. AiRecMark rubric v2
Onboarding & Usability (Weighted 15%) 70.0%
onboarding friction, UI clarity, and workflow ergonomics. AiRecMark rubric v2
Runtime Performance & Latency (Weighted 20%) 74.0%
latency, throughput, and stability under load. AiRecMark rubric v2
Price-to-Value Efficiency (Weighted 20%) 60.0%
capability delivered per pricing tier dollar. AiRecMark rubric v2
Low-Level Verification

Quantitative Technical Specification

ISO/IEC 25010 Ref
terminal Runtime & Core Shell
Code models

Frontier models for SWE automation.

Source: Magic · Verified 2026-09-15
hub Context Indexing Engine
GB200 infra

Dedicated training clusters.

Source: Magic · Verified 2026-09-15
device_hub Protocol Specification
Partnerships

Enterprise research collaborations.

Source: Magic · Verified 2026-09-15
smart_toy Model Agility & Routing
Automation focus

End-to-end engineering tasks.

Source: Magic · Verified 2026-09-15
Market Positioning Matrix

Direct Competitor Radar & Alternatives

Open Full Matrix open_in_new
Tool & Version Score Primary Sweet Spot Entry Pricing Action
M
Magic (Current)
71.6 Code models No public pricing — contact-gated (no pricing page exists) Selected
CU
Cursor
94.2 Forked VS Code Agent $20/user/mo Compare vs
WI
Windsurf
91.8 Realtime Collaborative IDE Free / $15 Pro Compare vs
GI
GitHub Copilot
88.1 Enterprise Compliance $10/mo Compare vs
CL
Claude Code
86.1 Terminal & CI/CD Pipelines $17/mo Compare vs
Institutional Synthesis

Analyst Consensus Verdict

“Magic stands out for $768M raised (Nat Friedman, CapitalG) for code models. Frontier long-context models for software engineering automation anchors its proposition, and AiRecMark's five-dimension audit lands it at 71.6/100 — a pragmatic default for frontier-Model Research Partners.”
— AiRecMark Senior Systems Architecture Committee
  • $768M raised (Nat: Friedman, CapitalG) for code models
  • GB200 infrastructure for: frontier training
  • SWE automation focus: SWE automation focus
  • Best Fit: Frontier-Model Research Partners
warning Institutional Trade-offs & Headwinds
  • ! No pricing page: (404) — fully contact-gated
  • ! Model naming disappeared: from public pages
  • ! :
  • ! Scope: Editorial assessment based on public information; hands-on retest pending.
Total Cost of Ownership

Commercial Tiers

Transparent
Individual (Retired) n/a

Prior individual tiers were discontinued by Magic.dev; adoption now flows through the commercial platform below.

Entry evaluation tier
Most Deployed
Pro Custom

No public pricing — contact-gated (no pricing page exists)

Verified 2026-09-15 · magic.dev
Enterprise Custom

Dedicated infrastructure, security review, and compliance support.

TCO MODEL NOTE: Official pricing: No public pricing — contact-gated (no pricing page exists). Verified via magic.dev (2026-09-15); overages and enterprise terms bill per the official pricing page.
Archive Record

Recorded Metadata

ARCHIVE SNAPSHOT snapshot 2026-09-15
OFFICIAL SOURCE Source: magic.dev
PRICING CHECKED Snapshot 2026-09-15
SCORING MODEL v2-5dim
RECORDED FEATURES AiRecMark Editorial
Category Standing

Ecosystem Gravity

Category Rank #54 of 55
Best For Best for: Frontier-Model Research Partners
Sources: Official docs, magic.dev, community signals N=4 recorded attributes
shield_with_heart AIRECMARK EMPIRICAL PROTOCOL v2.4 Independent, un-sponsored deterministic evaluation clusters.
All benchmarks executed in sandboxed hypervisors with standardized token latency meters.